Mercedes Mone says she lead by example, Glenn Jacobs tweets on the Harris campaign
– Mercedes Mone appeared on WFAN Sports Radio today to promote AEW’s upcoming Grand Slam episode of Dynamite. One of the questions posed to Mone was if she has assumed a mentor type role within the roster since joining and she responded with the following:
“I definitely lead by example. People definitely see what I do and follow what I do. I don’t have to go out there and be like, ‘I’m the leader, I’m the locker room leader or I’m this and that.’ People just see my presentations and how I walk into work and how I leave work and they want to emulate that.”
— Mone was also asked about the Vince McMahon docuseries which will stream on Netflix beginning tomorrow – whether it is a topic of conversation within the locker room and if she will be watching it:
“Well, I haven’t been talking to anyone. I stay in my locker room, I stay in my lane but all I do know, I’m going to grab a blunt, I’m going to get some wine, and I’m going to be watching some Netflix. I can’t wait.”
– Glenn Jacobs talks politics:
The Harris campaign relies on baseless emotional appeals because they have no actual plan or policy to stand on.
If Kamala really wanted to fix the economy or close the border, she already would have.
— Glenn Jacobs (@GlennJacobsTN) September 24, 2024
@Joseph Some people just don’t understand the differences between a well organised immigration policy for sustainable population, and a policy of allowing a mass influx of people without proper verification of criminal history. Those people only have to look at the demographics of those being ushered through the border to see the dangers involved.
There will always be a certain percentage of the populace that will disengage their brains from critical thinking, adopting the narratives of their preferred mainstream media instead.
@Joseph
And, what DB doesn’t seem to understand is how often, when he insults, just how much he’s describing himself.
He wants to forget the growing number of rightist media outlets being sued, and eventually settling with voting machine companies, for the lies that it turns out those same outlets are proven to have put forth.
He also wants to ignore that the fact that the people he IDs with (politically) aren’t actually interested in meaningful immigration reform, but getting rid of people not like them & people they don’t like.
In fact, DB will likely never acknowledge the details of the recent immigration bill that Trump had scuttled just because it would have given Biden an immigration win before November’s election.
@Joseph
See, from what I remember that’s the same argument we had some time ago about people reproducing and population. Only then you were on the other side of the fence.
Descendants of immigrants turning away immigrants is hypocritical any way you slice it. That’s my point, I’m not claiming it’s wrong or right, and I don’t give a crap about your laws, what’s legal, and what’s not. I don’t have a horse in the race. I will never immigrate to the US, legally or otherwise, even though it’d be rather easy for me. Your country may be great, but the general population sucks…
And see what you’ve done? Now you’ve got Dumbass all upset and confused because he can’t tell the difference between critical thinking and mainstream media manipulation and is going all “me smart” again…
“proper verification of criminal history”. You clueless moron…
@Luke
“Descendants of immigrants turning away immigrants is hypocritical any way you slice it.”
It’s only hypocritical if those ancestors who immigrated to America, came here illegally.
@Joseph
Nothing legal about colonization. And your legal immigration system is broken, just like your legal system in general. Again, global problems, not limited to US.
By the way, would you like to touch upon the subject of braindead nationalists who try to hunt down anyone they feel is “alien” (not necessarily illegal, just coming off like that to them) and who are stimulated by people wanting to “close the borders”?
@Luke
First off no, colonization is not legal, now. Not since the 1960s. It was however legal when King James I of England granted charters to establish settlements in North America. Our legal immigration system is broken, and it does need fixed. Never said it was good. Just like our legal system needs fixed.
Would I like to comment on those people? No not really because I have nothing to do with them and couldn’t care less about them. All I’ll say is no citizen, unless employed by the government and doing their job, has the right to go after anyone they deem illegal.
@Joseph
And what right exactly did King James I of ENGLAND have to grant charters to establish settlements in North America?
@Luke
I don’t know, maybe because he was the King of England. England, France, and Spain all had colonies in North America. Was it legal at the time? yes. Would it be legal now? No.
@Joseph
It was only legal for the colonists, no one asked the colonized for permission and no one cared about their laws. Same thing applies now. If a stronger country (thankfully there isn’t one) decides to colonize you, you can stick your legality up your ass. Contrary to what you may believe, we’re really not any more civilized or evolved than back then, we just have better and cooler toys…
But again, I don’t care about laws. You brought them into this conversation. I still don’t really get what for…
@Luke
Of course, no one asked their permission to take over the land. Who would do that? Do you think any ruler at that time would send someone out to various lands asking permission to take over?
Colonization today is illegal but it’s still happening.
Did I bring the law into the conversation? You asked if Columbus was legal. I answered and you commented about taking my house. Before that, the only time I mentioned legality was in reference to legal or illegal immigration.
According to deputy DHS Director Patrick J. Lechleitner’s letter of response on September 25, 2024, to Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX)’s letter to the DHS on March 13, 2024, a paragraph stated:
“As of July 21, 2024, there were 662,566 noncitizens with criminal histories on ICE’s national docket, which includes those detained by ICE and on the agency’s non-detained docket. Of those, 435,729 are convicted criminals, and 226,847 have pending criminal charges.”
So much for the arguments from the mockingbird press fanatics on here. Glenn Jacobs is absolutely correct in his criticism of Kamala “Border Czar” Harris.
@DB
Did you hear about how Congress was all set to pass an immigration reform bill, but Trump didn’t want Biden getting a win before the election, so he forced Congressional Republicans to kill the bill?
So much for the arguments from the rightist propaganda fanatics on here. Turns out, the Big Red R3t@rd is as much delusion & ignorant as Trump himself is.
@ Joseph
Yeah, and that was the time you brought it in, one is enough. No matter, I’m out, I can’t convince you we’re talking about two different things. Regardless, I look forward to arguing equally irrelevant stuff with you in the future.
@DB
Whoooooosh!
But yeah, you’re right, your legal system sucks.
@Woooo!
Could you provide a link to the immigration reform bill so we could see what’s in it?
@Luke
I don’t think we’re talking about two different things, just looking at it from two different perspectives. It’s my understanding that you believe the land was stolen from the Native Americans and built by immigrants, so we have no right to say who can or cannot come here. I think you said it was hypocritical for descendants of immigrants to turn away immigrants.
My viewpoint is that yes, at one time it was their land, but it’s not their land anymore. You can argue and say there’s nothing legal about colonization but to me, it was legal at the time and whether through force, bribery, or whatever means. the Native Americans lost the land, and it now belongs to the United States. As for immigration I don’t deny that our system needs work, but my stance has always been that I have nothing against anyone trying to enter legally. As far as I know, no legal immigrant, or descendant of a legal immigrant has a problem with anyone entering legally. Sure, there may be a few that are against it, but the majority of us simply want people to come here legally.
But you’re right. this conversation has run its course and there’s nowhere to go from here. It was fun.
@Joseph
Here’s the best I could do, as far as text of the bipartisan immigration reform bill that Trump had killed so it wouldn’t tank his 2024 campaign: https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/unraveling-misinformation-about-bipartisan-immigration-bill/
@Woooo!
Thank you. First off, I think the 60 billion to Ukraine and the other money should not have been in there. I’ll never understand why they simply cannot have an immigration bill without all this other stuff attached to it. As for what was actually in the immigration bill, I can’t say I can see why it was actually blocked other than to say that politics on both sides are destroying this country. That’s not a Trump this or Harris that. Simply saying that when it comes to both the democratic party and the republican party, it’s all about the win and it has nothing to do with what is best for this country.
@Joseph I agree with your statement about the extra funding attached to the bill. Here is the link to the bill summary at the US Senate Committee on Appropriations, without commentary from a partisan “fact check” site. You will also find a link to the actual bill on that page.
https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/murray-releases-text-of-bipartisan-national-security-supplemental
Out of the $118.28 billion listed, only 17.10% is for actual immigration funding. $93.76 billion, or 79.27% of the bill is for warfare funding, the biggest recipients being for the military of Ukraine and the military of Israel. This was a terrible bill.
@Joseph
DB has to realize that, just because some website doesn’t kowtow to Trump’s MAGA world doesn’t mean it’s partisan.
And, the single fact that Trump didn’t like it (because it would essentially politically neuter his campaign) is the ONLY reason it was declared DOA in Congress. It would have given Biden the win needed to essentially end Trump’s campaign, and THAT’s why the MAGA sheep, like DB, are blindly following Trump’s lead.
@DB
Yeah, I don’t like that most of the funding went to that and only a small percentage actually went to the immigration problem.
@Woooo!
Would it have given him a win? After all people say that Biden’s catch and release program and other policies have led to or been partially to blame for the current problem. So even though this might have been a step in the right direction, I’m not sure I’d say it would have given him the big win you think.
@Joseph
So, you HONESTLY think, if the bill was better, that Trump would have let Congress pass it? I mean, that STILL would have been a win for Biden, and we’ve seen how Trump is opposed to ANYTHING that would cost him an win in November’s election.
And, for how much Democrats are getting the blame, can ANYONE point out what Republicans have done to help out with the border situation? I’m going to go out on a limb here (to use an old saying), and dare say that there’s not a thing that even a Trumper like DB can actually point to that would have effectively been a positive solution for the border problem.
So, you can believe whatever you want, but Trump is clearly showing his power over the GOP, and he’s going to make sure they don’t do anything that could somehow, in some way, shape, or form, hand the November election to Harris.
@Woooo!
I’m not sure if it would have passed just like I’m not sure if the roles were reversed it would have passed because it’s not about the border but points.
“Can ANYONE point out what Republicans have done to help out with the border situation? ”
In 2017 trump signed Executive Order 13768 which greatly expands the category of people classified as “priorities for removal,” making all aliens who have been charged with a crime, or believed could have been charged with a crime, priorities for deportation.
In 2021 Biden revoked it.
republicans lean more towards deporting immigrants here illegally and democrats seem to be more in favor of finding ways for them to stay.
@Joseph
Well, maybe it’s Republicans’ friends in Corporate America that want the undocumented to stay here so they can work for much less pay than what they’re trying to force American workers to stay here for.
@Woooo!
So once again it’s the republicans. No matter what, it’s the republicans. It’s not Biden’s catch and release program which instead of holding someone or deporting them, let them go into the community while they waited for their hearing in immigration court. It’s all the republicans.
@Joseph
To take an old page out of DB’s playbook…
Honestly, you’re starting to sound a lot like DB, in his blind loyalty to the GOP. It wouldn’t surprise me if you were him under a different name.
Oh, and to counter your argument about it being the fault of Biden & his “catch & release program”: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/25/richard-hudson/border-crossings-are-not-because-biden-stopped-wal/ (even though I know people like DB & you won’t bother to read anything that doesn’t make Biden look evil & paints Trump as a saint).